Facebook Twitter Instagram
    blokus
    • technology
    • Gaming
    • science
    • policy
    • cars
    blokus

    The White Home should reply for the ban on unlocking cell telephones

    By Jon BrodkinFebruary 21, 2013
    Share VKontakte Email Reddit Telegram Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
    ars logo open grey

    The White House will have to provide answers on whether it thinks cell phone unlocking should be illegal. Unlocking cell phones unlocks them from specific carriers, allowing users to switch to a different cellular provider. This was the law until recently, when the Library of Congress decided not to renew the Digital Millennium Copyright Act exemption for open access.

    Angry cell phone users accusation The White House is petitioning for a change of this policy. The petition was filed days after the White House said petitions would only be answered if they received 100,000 signatures within a month, instead of the previous threshold of 25,000.

    The mobile phone unlocking request exceeded 100,000 today, two days before the deadline. You can also sign it if you want. The text reads:

    WE ASK THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:

    Are Unlocked Cell Phones Legal.

    The Senate of Congress decided in October 2012 that unlocking cell phones would be excluded from the exemptions to the DMCA.

    On January 26, customers will no longer be able to unlock their phones for use on another network without the carrier’s permission, even after their contract has expired.

    Customers will be forced to pay higher roaming charges to make calls while traveling abroad. It reduces consumer choice, and reduces the reusability of devices that customers have paid for in full.

    The librarian noted that carriers are offering more unlocked phones now, but most of the phones sold are still locked.

    We ask that the White House ask the Speaker of Congress to cancel this decision, and if that fails, champion a bill that makes it completely legal.

    While the White House often provides a response to petitions, there does not appear to be any deadline for doing so. For example, a successful petition from May 2012 asking the government to “require free access on the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from tax-funded research” went and did not answer.

    Please rate this post

    0 / 7

    Your page rank:

    Previous ArticleMontreal’s transit authority threatens a $49,200 advantageous over the brand new Counter-Strike map
    Next Article If Google is decreasing pirate websites, why is “mp3skull” nonetheless the highest end result?

    Related Posts

    Elon Musk on X antisemitism controversy: “Do not promote. go your self”

    November 30, 2023

    Nvidia CEO: US chip independence may take 20 years to attain

    November 30, 2023

    Google to pay the “hyperlink tax” of Canada, dropped the specter of eradicating information from search

    November 30, 2023

    Google reverses new ban on net browser after one other bogus DMCA takedown

    November 29, 2023
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    MAIN

    The Outer Worlds Overview: Fall deep into the sport as the perfect Fallout in years

    Fallout universe is one of the best … ahem, sorry, I continue to rejoice with…

    Candy black holes can glow at midnight

    November 8, 2017

    Intel sues SF advertising and marketing firm over logos

    July 20, 2015

    ISPs don’t wish to inform the FCC precisely the place they provide Web service

    October 13, 2017
    copyright © 2023 all rights reserved/Blokus.one
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website blokus.one is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.