Facebook Twitter Instagram
    blokus
    • technology
    • Gaming
    • science
    • policy
    • cars
    blokus

    Intercourse, medication, and soiled films: CleanFlicks prosecutes the doppelganger

    By Nate AndersonFebruary 5, 2008
    Share VKontakte Email Reddit Telegram Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
    ars logo open grey

    Police in Utah recently arrested 31-year-old Daniel Thompson for paying 14-year-old girls $20 each for oral sex. At Thompson’s business, police found a cache of pornographic films “along with a keg of beer, painkillers and two cameras attached to a television.” Such stories aren’t representative enough to inspire much in the way of commentary, but here’s the flavor of hypocrisy about it: Thompson’s business is selling the “clean” parts of the film with the naughty bits cut out.

    This sounds more than a bit like the argument CleanFlicks company from a few years ago, and it’s not for nothing. In fact Thompson has resigned as the operator of CleanFlicks, although in reality, he has little to do with the company. When news of his arrest broke, papers and blogs began reporting a link between Thompson and CleanFlicks, with some even claiming he was the company’s founder.

    The problem: CleanFlicks is still in business after its demise at the hands of Hollywood, and it sells unedited versions of family-friendly movies. Given the terrible bad press surrounding the Thompson case, CleanFlicks went on a PR campaign to clear his name and also filed a federal lawsuit against Thompson.

    When CleanFlicks sold its brick-and-mortar stores several years ago, Thompson’s father bought a couple and gave them to his son to work … when Thompson got out of prison for security fraud. In retrospect, this is not a great idea, but you have to feel for the father who tries to help his son go straight, only to be rewarded with stories of booze and porn.

    Daniel Thompson is the manager of the two stores, which continue to operate under the name “CleanFlicks”. CleanFlix, which had stopped offering edited movies after losing a federal court battle in 2006, told Thompson to stop using his name. Thompson renamed his stores to “Flix Club” and continued to edit films.

    But Thompson apparently continued to use the CleanFlicks name in his marketing, even using the MySpace page http://www.myspace.com/cleanflicks.

    In wake of Thompson’s bust, CleanFlicks has filed a federal lawsuit (a copy of which has been found by Ars Technica) seeking, among other things, $100,000 under the Cyberpiracy Prevention Act. He also wants at least $1 million for voluntary use of the company’s trademark.

    CleanFlicks too launch a website to clear up the confusion and ask all “journalists, bloggers, and media sites” to correct any inaccurate information that has already been published. The industry’s response has been strident, but that’s to be expected; CleanFlicks announced its new business model in January, only to see its launch marred by terrible PR a few weeks later.

    A copyright-related side note to this issue: Thompson has continued to edit movies at Flix Club because he says a “doctrine clause” in copyright law makes the act legal if it’s sold to schools and universities. While the copyright law lacks some important provisions related to films for educational programs, FlixClub’s actions seem unlikely to have passed in court.

    The whole scheme unfolded after the mother of one of the 14-year-old girls asked her daughter where the new $20 bill came from. The answer (“Working for a guy behind the scenes—and a store full of drugs, Mom”) landed Thompson in trouble with both the police and with CleanFlicks. While prosecutors could throw him in jail, CleanFlicks is looking to spoil it.

    Is there any hypocrisy in a company like CleanFlicks once stepping on the copyright of filmmakers and now using the legal system to enforce its own intellectual property rights? We report, he decided.

    Further reading:

    • Lurid simple explanation courtesy of The Salt Lake Tribune
    • Christianity Today has some nice area of ​​the case…
    • … as you do USA Today (Both outlets initially reported Thompson as being linked to CleanFlicks; both have since updated their stories)
    • If you like your character development a dash of snark, consider DVD Dossier’s writing of the case
    • CleanFlicks get online to protect himself
    • CleanFlicks lawsuit filed in Utah District Court; If you have PACER access, the case number is 2:08-cv-00086-PMW

    Please rate this post

    0 / 7

    Your page rank:

    Previous ArticleFCC prods cable firms in tiff with indie programmers
    Next Article IFPI sues Baidu, Yahoo China over deep linking MP3s

    Related Posts

    Elon Musk on X antisemitism controversy: “Do not promote. go your self”

    November 30, 2023

    Nvidia CEO: US chip independence may take 20 years to attain

    November 30, 2023

    Google to pay the “hyperlink tax” of Canada, dropped the specter of eradicating information from search

    November 30, 2023

    Google reverses new ban on net browser after one other bogus DMCA takedown

    November 29, 2023
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    MAIN

    Is 200-300 miles sufficient for Tesla to interrupt into an electrical automobile?

    On Thursday, Reuters reported that Tesla is building electric semis with ranges of 200-300 miles.…

    SpaceX units a revolution file, flying the identical rocket in 51 days (Replace)

    July 20, 2020

    New AT&T on-line TV has contracts, hidden prices, nice 2nd yr value extension

    March 3, 2020

    Prisons pocket as much as 60 p.c of what inmates pay for telephone calls

    October 24, 2017
    copyright © 2023 all rights reserved/Blokus.one
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website blokus.one is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.